- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2004 11:32:42 +0300
- To: <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org > [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Steve Harris > Sent: 26 August, 2004 11:11 > To: 'RDF interesting groupe' > Subject: Re: Reification - whats best practice? > > > > On Wed, Aug 25, 2004 at 10:47:13 -0700, Bob MacGregor wrote: > > Sandro Hawke wrote: > > > > The right solution is to use contexts. Contexts can be implemented > > using quads instead of triples, or by using a scheme for > > encapsulating groups of statements, as is done in the > Triple system. > > The DAWG committee is taking baby steps towards contexts by > > including a SOURCE element in BRQL. If you substitute the term > > "context" for "source" in a BRQL query, then you have quads. Some > > of us are planning to "abuse" BRQL by treating the sources as if > > they are contexts. I would not be surprised if members of the DAWG > > committee have that in mind (but I can't speak for them). > > It is still up in the air wether SOURCE will be included, some of the > members are not keen on it. It would be a great pity if it were not included, even as an optional feature, as there are so many use cases and real-world examples of relevant usage. Patrick
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 08:33:08 UTC