RE: Reification - whats best practice?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> [mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of ext Lars Marius
> Garshol
> Sent: 26 August, 2004 11:39
> To: 'RDF interesting groupe'
> Subject: Re: Reification - whats best practice?
> 
> | how do you propose exchanging quad-store data?  My store knows that
> | source x said {a b c}, but how do I publish that fact?
> 
> Well, leaving RDF/XML aside, it doesn't seem very difficult to create
> an XML syntax where the reification is done without having to create
> global identifiers for the statements. 

For an XML serialization of RDF graphs with explicit support for
named graphs (which provide for indirect support for scope, context,
provenance, trust, etc.) in addition to being XSLT and XQuery friendly
c.f. TriX: http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2004/HPL-2004-56

Patrick

--

Patrick Stickler
Nokia, Finland
patrick.stickler@nokia.com

Received on Thursday, 26 August 2004 09:10:40 UTC