- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 08:34:37 -0400
- To: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Cc: Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
* Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org> [2003-09-18 10:24+0100] > > At 09:32 18/09/03 +0300, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > >Any solution for tracking source/authority of assertions will > >be proprietary -- even if it constitutes a widely supported > >idiom. > > I agree, except to note that the state of being proprietary is not > necessarily a life sentence. > > I do believe we should not be averse to experimentation with proprietary > mechanisms, and allow those that prove useful to be adopted as community > property. +1 (an alternative being design-by-committee... hopefully RDF IG provides some forum for bridging deployment experience to W3C standards track work...)
Received on Thursday, 18 September 2003 08:34:37 UTC