- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:25:56 -0400
- To: Bill de hÓra <dehora@eircom.net>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Sun, Sep 14, 2003 at 05:38:53AM -0400, Bill de hÓra wrote: > Mark Baker wrote: > > > I think that's different. All parties may know RDF, but those that know > > the rules of entailment will extract additional triples from the same > > message. > > It's not different. Knowing RDF means knowing its entailments, there > isn't anything else to 'know'. Oops, sorry, should have said "those that know the *RDFS* rules of entailment". Follow? Hence my RDFS media type suggestion, as it communicates that there are different entailments at work (i.e. makes the message more self-descriptive). I'm currently reading through the MT, specifically the RDFS entailment lemma. It seems relevant. Now, if only I had the "for dummies" version, I'd be all set. 8-/ Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Sunday, 14 September 2003 22:22:33 UTC