- From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Mon, 01 Sep 2003 14:08:35 +0100
- To: Ryan Lee <ryanlee@w3.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>, Ralph Swick <swick@w3.org>
My take on the thread between Mark Baker and Dave Beckett is that this option is still useful and conformant. Jeremy Ryan Lee wrote: > Hello, > > We are considering removing the option in the RDF Validator [1] labelled: > "RDF is NOT enclosed in <RDF>...</RDF> tags." The option was originally > introduced a couple years ago when the RDF/XML spec said a serialization > could either be contained in rdf:RDF tags or not. The spec has changed > to now claim that serialized RDF/XML "must be contained inside an rdf:RDF > XML element." [2] > > I belive this means the option is no longer relevant. Does anyone know > of reasons why we should not remove the option? > > 1. http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ > 2. http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-syntax-grammar/#section-Syntax-complete-document > > Regards, >
Received on Monday, 1 September 2003 09:16:54 UTC