- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 22:02:04 +0100
- To: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 13:34 12/10/03 -0700, Garret Wilson wrote: >I guess that sums it up. My current implementation keeps the original >namespace and local names around in the resource classes in case they are >needed later, but that's starting to become annoying and goes beyond RDF. Mine too. RDF doesn't require this, but neither does it forbid it. That seems just fine to me. #g ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 17:03:42 UTC