- From: Garret Wilson <garret@globalmentor.com>
- Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2003 13:34:30 -0700
- To: Jonathan Borden <jonathan@openhealth.org>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Jonathan, Jonathan Borden wrote: > It depends on what you desire for "re-serialization". As the computer science-y guy I sometimes am, I desire and demand no less than round-tripping... > yeah it doesn't necessarily matter what the original namespace+localname > *is*, does it? if so, you are currently SOL. I guess that sums it up. My current implementation keeps the original namespace and local names around in the resource classes in case they are needed later, but that's starting to become annoying and goes beyond RDF. I suppose syntactic round-tripping goes beyond RDF as well. >> Is there anything authoritative on this? >> > You heard it here. Thanks! :) Garret
Received on Sunday, 12 October 2003 16:34:41 UTC