- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:30:44 +0100
- To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>, "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Careful... rdf:li is part of the RDF/XML syntax, but is not of itself a defined property. An RDF parser maps occurrences of this (when used as a property) to rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc. See also my other message concerning rdfs:member. #g -- At 16:05 08/10/03 -0400, Mark Baker wrote: >On Wed, Oct 08, 2003 at 03:49:30PM -0400, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote: > > I guess that rdf:li plays that role > >Good catch. It seems obvious now that you mention it, but I agree that >the name provides ample camouflage. 8-) > >Mark. >-- >Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 18:38:45 UTC