- From: Graham Klyne <GK@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2003 23:28:42 +0100
- To: "DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO)" <bob.ducharme@lexisnexis.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Well, there is rdfs:member in the latest RDF revision, of which rdf:_1, rdf:_2, etc., are all sub-properties (according to [1]). #g -- [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/WD-rdf-mt-20030905/#rdfs_interp At 12:25 08/10/03 -0400, DuCharme, Bob (LNG-CHO) wrote: >Oops, that was a typo. I meant to ask if anyone new of a well-known >namespace with a "contains" predicate, which was why I mentioned the RDF >Primer's myfoo:container example. > >Bob > >-----Original Message----- >From: jon@spin.ie [mailto:jon@spin.ie] >Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 12:22 PM >To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org >Subject: RE: modeling nested containers with items > > > > > My new question: instead of the "created" predicate coming from > > some > > namespace that I just make up, does anyone know of one with these >semantics > > in a more well-known namespace? > >Qualified Dublin Core: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> has a predicate ><http://purl.org/dc/terms/created> for the date something was created. It's >often used with the W3C datetime format, which uses the extended ISO 8601 >format (with hyphens between parts) rather than the basic ISO 8601 you are >using. This is common on the web generally and I'd advise you use it for >interoperability. ------------ Graham Klyne GK@NineByNine.org
Received on Wednesday, 8 October 2003 18:38:31 UTC