- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Thu, 22 May 2003 10:36:04 +0300
- To: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>, <leo@ist.org>, <piotr@ideanest.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
> Constraining queries to concise bounded descriptions is a key to > controlling infoglut for SW agents, where otherwise, a simple query > can result in (potentially) thousands or tens of thousands or even > more triples when all it ever wanted was a rdfs:label or an rdf:type. Oh, and to clarify, the reason why the SW agent can't necessarily simply ask explicitly for an rdfs:label or such is because it may not be called that in the vocabularies employed by the server and thus, the SW agent must obtain the concise bounded description and, if possible, based on defined relations between ontologies, infer the knowledge it needs in terms of the vocabulary it uses, and the complete set of knowledge about the relationships between ontologies may not reside on the server(s) from which it gets the descriptions of the resources -- especially with regards to the local, possibly SW specific, vocabulary by which it guides its own internal actions. Cheers, Patrick
Received on Thursday, 22 May 2003 03:36:28 UTC