- From: Seth Ladd <seth@brivo.net>
- Date: 19 May 2003 13:43:32 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Mon, 2003-05-19 at 06:23, Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com wrote: > Howdy folks, > > I'm happy to announce the release of the first public version of URIQA, the > Nokia URI Query Agent, which is an example implementation of the URIQA model > for semantic web enabled servers. > > http://sw.nokia.com/URIQA.html Patrick, Why introduce a new HTTP header instead of using an existing one like Accept? How does URI-Resolution-Mode: Description differ from just setting Accept: application/rdf+xml? FWIW, the W3 TAG has been debating [1] if what you're doing (that is, if the description of a thing is different than the thing itself) is "the right thing", although they have been stuck for a while. I hope I don't stir it up again, just wanted to point it out. Seth [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/tag/ilist#httpRange-14
Received on Monday, 19 May 2003 13:45:23 UTC