- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 15 May 2003 08:15:08 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Thu, 2003-05-15 at 03:41, Brian McBride wrote: > The RDF Semantics document specifies the formal semantics of RDF(S). It > includes an informative appendix > > http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/#Lbase > > which restates the semantics in the form of a small set of axioms. The > intent is that this representation is easier to understand. > > RDFCore have had a last call comment suggesting this appendix be removed: > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2003JanMar/0092.html > > It would be helpful in resolving this comment, for the WG to have feedback > on whether or not folks find this appendix useful. I have always liked the idea. I just took a look at the version pointed to above, and I like the execution too. In particular, I'm very interested to see a version that corresponds to recent WG decisions. It would probably clarify where we are on goofy literals (danc-02) with a minimum of searching. > > Brian -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 15 May 2003 09:30:53 UTC