- From: Jimmy Cerra <jimbobbs@hotmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 May 2003 22:27:47 -0400
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: <rhm@cdepot.net>
That reminds me a lot of the concept of scope in XTM. The rough idea is that a specific topic may have different meanings, implementations, etcetera in different contexts or scopes. I think that rdf:Bag, rdf:Alt and rdf:Seq should end up being used in this context, as in: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Jane"> <rdf:type> <rdf:Alt> <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource"> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="#Aristotle" /> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#Man" /> </rdf:li> <rdf:li rdf:parseType="Resource"> <rdfs:isDefinedBy rdf:resource="#Politics" /> <rdf:type rdf:resource="#Woman" /> </rdf:li> </rdf:Alt> </rdf:type> </rdf:Description> Although I wish the language would be extended so I could say this: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Jane"> <rdf:type> <rdf:Alt> <rdf:li rdf:scope="#Aristotle" rdf:resource="#Man" /> <rdf:li rdf:scope="#Politics" rdf:resource="#woman" /> </rdf:Alt> </rdf:type> </rdf:Description> Just as you do with different language scopes in the current spec: <rdf:Description rdf:about="#Jane"> <rdf:type> <rdf:Alt> <rdf:li xml:lang="en-us" rdf:resource="#Woman" /> <rdf:li xml:lang="x-klingon" rdf:resource="#Be%27%27e%27" /> </rdf:Alt> </rdf:type> </rdf:Description> -- James F. Cerra
Received on Thursday, 8 May 2003 22:27:54 UTC