- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jun 2003 15:25:27 +0100
- To: RDF interest group <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I find myself wondering if the proposals for unit conversions are slightly missing a deeper, more pervasive issue. A statement to the effect that 1 inch is 2.54 centimetres I think has two important parts: (a) a universally quantified assertion; e.g. forall x, x inches is the same as f(x) centimetres, for some specified f. This seems a bit like a "rule" to me. (b) arithmetic relations: the function 'f' alluded to above being defined in terms of common arithmetic operations. (I observe that similar case not amenable to a simple conversion factor would be to express the equivalence of temperatures expressed in Fahrenheit or Celsius scales.) To date, RDF has not standardized any form or arithmetic relationship. Means to represent numerical values are relatively new, currently proposed by RDFcore. CWM has built-in properties that correspond to arithmetic relationships [1]. This suggests to me that we don't really need anything new that isn't already being done. There's a lot of activity devoted to the development of rules [2] [3]. It seems that there already exists a design for RDF properties dealing with relations based on arithmetic operations [1], though I could see a case for making that work a little more "forceful" -- e.g. by publication as a W3C Note, with a view to taking it to the recommendation track in future RDF working groups. #g -- [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/doc/CwmBuiltins.html (see math: predicates). [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-rules/ [3] http://www.daml.org/rules/ ------------------- Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org> PGP: 0FAA 69FF C083 000B A2E9 A131 01B9 1C7A DBCA CB5E
Received on Monday, 16 June 2003 10:28:48 UTC