- From: Benja Fallenstein <b.fallenstein@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2003 16:45:03 +0200
- To: mbatsis@netsmart.gr
- CC: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi Emmanuil, Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) wrote: > Benja Fallenstein wrote: >> Then how can it be that two URIs that denote the *same* resource can >> give me *different* representations when I put them into my browser? > > URIs have no special meaning in RDF. They are not supposed to locate or > retreive something as far as the spec goes, AFAIK. Yes, in RDF the concept of a representation of a resource does not, per the spec, have any meaning. The discussion I started here is about the intersection of the Web's and RDF's use of URIs. So, it's true that this discussion is outside the scope of the RDF spec. But I want to *use* RDF in a way that involves the Web. I'm interested in a model of what the Web does (dealing with representations) that can be expressed in RDF. - Benja
Received on Monday, 28 July 2003 10:46:47 UTC