- From: Emmanuil Batsis (Manos) <mbatsis@netsmart.gr>
- Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 12:49:53 +0200
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote: > Pragmatically speaking, is this a good model to follow? Supporting such a model may become a real pain as mappings are not stable. I think standards like RDF should not get into this. If an application needs to be aware of the relationships between URIs as you have demonstrated, building such a mechanism (e.g. a set of properties in RDF) is easy. The difficult part is controlling the accuracy of those mappings through time and change. Web application/server behavior is another factor, as a web server may serve different documents for the same URI depending on the client. How can you cover all the possibilities in a usefull way? > And architecturaly, I'm left wondering whether there is a useful > generalization built around the fact that many web servers allow GET's > on one URL to be mapped to a different URL. I think we need something bigger to place that upon. RDDL was a good start. Something that documents a resource, it's type, whether it's retreivable, static or dynamic, possible URI mappings or relationships and the conditions under which those mappings are valid etc. Loads and loads of work in this one. Manos
Received on Wednesday, 29 January 2003 07:50:17 UTC