- From: <Art.Barstow@nokia.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 09:00:15 -0500
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
In Mike Dean's formal objection to the Datatyping Solution proposed in the Jan 23 LC WD docs [1], one of the alternate proposals he suggests is: [[ an RDF datatyping approach that includes global datatyping (as in Proposal F from [4]) possibly with optional local datatyping ]] Did the RDF Core WG consider such an option (to support both local and global datatyping)? If so, why was it rejected? Regards, Art Barstow --- [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2003Jan/0173.html
Received on Tuesday, 28 January 2003 09:01:51 UTC