- From: Marc Carrion <marc_carrion@yahoo.es>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2003 08:39:55 -0800 (PST)
- To: Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Yes, I know that if I say
<ns:B rdf:ID="foo"/>
that implies
<ns:C rdf:ID="foo"/>
The thing is we would like to say that we cannot
have
<ns:C rdf:ID="foo"/>
without having
<ns:A rdf:ID="foo"/>
or
<ns:B rdf:ID="foo"/>
or any other subclass of C.
so we couldn't have a resource that is only of type
C.
In other words, we would like to define C as
abstract.
Regards,
Marc
--- Jon Hanna <jon@spin.ie> wrote:
>
> > I meant, I can have
> > <ns:C rdf:ID="foo"/>
>
> If you have <ns:B rdf:ID="foo"/> then you are
> implying <ns:C rdf:ID="foo"/>
>
> It may not be particularly useful to you (right now)
> to say that, but it's
> obviously true.
>
=====
......\|||/................................................
(. .)
-oOOo---0---oOOo-------
|marc_carrion@yahoo.es|
| ooO Ooo |
----( )--( )-----------
() ()
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail Plus - Powerful. Affordable. Sign up now.
http://mailplus.yahoo.com
Received on Thursday, 23 January 2003 11:39:57 UTC