- From: Sandro Hawke <sandro@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 12:48:37 -0500
- To: Chet Murthy <chet@watson.ibm.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> I found the thread on this subject, but did not find a resolution as > to whether one should allow blank nodes in the property position, or > not. And, of course, if so, how to represent such graphs as RDF/XML. > > Did this get decided? The issues list says that the issue of allowing blank nodes as properties is "postponed till a future Version of RDF" [1]. The Test Cases also show the N-Triples syntax [2] does not allow it. The final nail is probably "Arcs are labelled with URI references" in [3]. Of course these are still working drafts, and the sun could rise in the west tomorrow. :-) Can I ask how this issue has been affecting your development work? -- sandro [1] http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-bnode-predicates [2] but http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-testcases/#ntriples [3] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/TR/WD-rdf-concepts-20030117/#section-URI-Vocabulary
Received on Friday, 10 January 2003 12:48:48 UTC