- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jan 2003 17:39:28 -0800
- To: <seth@robustai.net>, "Bob MacGregor" <macgregor@ISI.EDU>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Received on Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:39:41 UTC
I designed MKR using the first method. I decided on a context theory, and then implemented it. It works -- in theory & in practice. ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done knowledge haspart proposition list ----- Original Message ----- From: Bob MacGregor To: seth@robustai.net Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org Sent: Saturday, January 04, 2003 1:11 PM Subject: Arguing against quads <snip> There are two ways that progress happens in the KR field. One is that nice theoretical models are devised, and then implementers figure out efficient implementations for them. The other is that implementers play around with various things, and find out experimentally what users find useful, and then later (possibly much later), the resulting semantics gets formalized. Contexts fall into this latter category. <snip>
Received on Saturday, 4 January 2003 20:39:41 UTC