Re: cwm/n3 and naming blank nodes? (calendar rules)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

/ Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org> was heard to say:
| Norm Walsh asked, back on 1Dec...
| http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-interest/2002Dec/0002.html
|
| about rules for repeating events, some with
| end markers and some without.
|
| I completely missed that message, as I only catch
| up with www-rdf-interest occasionally, but meanwhile, in
| www-rdf-calendar, I wrote some rules that, I think,
| answer Norm's question.

Ah, yes. You're solution works by adding a new property (:birthEvent) to the
graph. I hadn't thought of doing that. Is there a solution that doesn't add
a new property?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

- -- 
Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM    | Through space the universe grasps me and
XML Standards Architect | swallows me up like a speck; through thought
Web Tech. and Standards | I grasp it.--Pascal
Sun Microsystems, Inc.  | 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/>

iD8DBQE+FZpqOyltUcwYWjsRAr28AKCbsQKIdGtFH9zOJm4vAwgPQtCj6ACeJTWr
s56qiIY6plOcJ4c7+DAoHZ4=
=4raC
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----