- From: Roger L. Costello <costello@mitre.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:55:15 -0500
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Hi Folks, I have a couple of questions on RDF Schemas: 1. Suppose that I have an RDF/XML instance that contains a Length property: <Length> <rdf:Description> <rdf:value>6300</rdf:value> <uom:units>kilometers</uom:units> </rdf:Description> </Length> As you can see, the contents of Length is an anonymous resource. How should Length be defined in an RDF Schema? Here is how I imagine that it should be defined: <rdf:Property rdf:ID="Length"> <rdfs:domain rdfs:resource="#River"/> </rdf:Property> Note that I do not specify an rdfs:range value, thus Length can have any value. Is this the proper way to define a property with a value that is an anonymous resource? Similarly, above it shows a property uom:units within the anonymous resource. I am not sure how to define it. I believe that this is how to define it: <rdf:Property rdf:ID="units"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://.../rdf-schema#Literal"/> </rdf:Property> Note that I do not specify an rdfs:domain value, thus units can be used in any class. Is this the proper way to define a property that is to be used in an anonymous resource? 2. Consider this property definition of FlowRate: <rdf:Property rdf:ID="FlowRate"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://.../rdf-schema#Literal"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#River"/> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Brook"/> </rdf:Property> Note the two rdfs:domain statements. This says that the property FlowRate may be used with a class that is a River AND a Brook. How do I define FlowRate so that it may be used with either a River class OR a Brook class? Is this the way to do it: <rdf:Property rdf:ID="FlowRate"> <rdfs:range rdf:resource="http://.../rdf-schema#Literal"/> </rdf:Property> <rdf:Property rdf:about="#FlowRate"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#River"/> </rdf:Property> <rdf:Property rdf:about="#FlowRate"> <rdfs:domain rdf:resource="#Brook"/> </rdf:Property> Note that I defined the FlowRate property first and then I "added to it" using two more property definitions. Is this how ORing is achieved? /Roger
Received on Wednesday, 19 February 2003 15:55:27 UTC