- From: James Michael DuPont <mdupont777@yahoo.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:11:18 +0100 (CET)
- To: Daniel eikeon Krech <eikeon@eikeon.com>
- Cc: Stephen Compall <s11@member.fsf.org>, Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>, introspectors <introspector-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>, minddog@cannibutter.com, "www-rdf-interest@w3.org" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, developers@dotgnu.org
--- "Daniel \"eikeon\" Krech" <eikeon@eikeon.com> schrieb: > On Tue, 2003-02-11 at 10:16, James Michael DuPont wrote: > > > What do you think? Who would like to be involved? I would like to > get > > one member from the various rdf implementations there, the is the > most > > important part. We need your support! > > I would like to be involved. Cool. Dajob said he and you were talking about aligning interfaces. we need to get a core set of axioms, what we can all agree on. Everything else needs to be derived from that. >I have done some thinking on how the > rdflib > interfaces would map into C# and am interested in convergence / > alignment with other interfaces. Things like hashes, uri, arrays and lists, all are core parts of the ecma, and should be available under all c# implementations. Even under parrot/python/perl we can assume an equivalent interface. Even so, maybe should create these types as redland has done, and implement them as part derive from the ECMA classes? I think that we should just use the standard directly, we are not aiming to make a java standard, but a c# interface standard in the first step. The IL interfaces will be available from any language once first defined. I think we need to concentrate on the types and the method signatures, not the implementations.C# provides a very clean way to do this, as shown by the ECMA spec. mike ===== James Michael DuPont http://introspector.sourceforge.net/ __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Bis zu 100 MB Speicher bei http://premiummail.yahoo.de
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2003 17:11:50 UTC