- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:00 +0000
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 22:42 21/12/03 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote:
> > Yes... I think that name :- { ... } allows one to do the same thing
>within
> > a single Notation3 "document".
>
>Maybe... one thing I could understand is that
><uri-of-some-rdf-document> log:semantics {some-set-of-triples-in-notation3}
>could be the case when the dereferencing of <uri-of-some-rdf-document>
>yields the same set of triples as { some-set-of-triples-in-notation3 }.
OK, I got log:semantics wrong above... your example here makes more sense
to me.
So log:semantics says that its object is the graph you get by dereferencing
and parsing as RDF/N3 the resource identified by the subject? In which
case, the equivalence would be:
if:
ex:someName :- { (some set of triples) }
then:
ex:docName log:semantics { (some set of triples) }
would be equivalent to:
ex:docName log:semantics ex:someName
by my understanding of :- here.
#g
------------
Graham Klyne
For email:
http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 22 December 2003 04:18:36 UTC