- From: Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
- Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2003 08:52:00 +0000
- To: "Jos De_Roo" <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
At 22:42 21/12/03 +0100, Jos De_Roo wrote: > > Yes... I think that name :- { ... } allows one to do the same thing >within > > a single Notation3 "document". > >Maybe... one thing I could understand is that ><uri-of-some-rdf-document> log:semantics {some-set-of-triples-in-notation3} >could be the case when the dereferencing of <uri-of-some-rdf-document> >yields the same set of triples as { some-set-of-triples-in-notation3 }. OK, I got log:semantics wrong above... your example here makes more sense to me. So log:semantics says that its object is the graph you get by dereferencing and parsing as RDF/N3 the resource identified by the subject? In which case, the equivalence would be: if: ex:someName :- { (some set of triples) } then: ex:docName log:semantics { (some set of triples) } would be equivalent to: ex:docName log:semantics ex:someName by my understanding of :- here. #g ------------ Graham Klyne For email: http://www.ninebynine.org/#Contact
Received on Monday, 22 December 2003 04:18:36 UTC