- From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo@agfa.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2003 00:52:32 +0100
- To: "David Menendez <zednenem" <zednenem@psualum.com>
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org, Graham Klyne <gk@ninebynine.org>
David Menendez writes: > Jos De_Roo writes: > >> Using <uri-of-some-set-of-triples> as an example >> was misleading. We normally identify the *document* >> on which the rdf formula is written and so it would >> have been better when I would have used >> <uri-of-some-rdf-document> and then I still think >> that we *call* some-set-of-triples >> <uri-of-some-rdf-document>!log:semantics > > Does <uri-of-some-rdf-document> indicate a resource available through > the web? If so, is the assumption that log:semantics may relate the same > resource to different graphs over time? I believe so... > For example, Alice might post a FOAF profile at > <http://example.com/alice>, leading to this data: > > <http://example.com/alice> log:semantics { > _:a rdf:type foaf:Person. > _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@example.com>. > _:a foaf:name "Ailce". > }. > > The next day, she fixes the typo, and we get: > > <http://example.com/alice> log:semantics { > _:a rdf:type foaf:Person. > _:a foaf:mbox <mailto:alice@example.com>. > _:a foaf:name "Alice". > }. > > This means we can't treat <http://example.com/alice>!log:semantics as an > identifier of a specific graph, because it indicates different graphs at > different times. It is indeed true that it could indicate different graphs at different times. [[ There are several aspects of meaning in RDF which are ignored by this semantics; in particular, it treats URI references as simple names, ignoring aspects of meaning encoded in particular URI forms [RFC 2396] and does not provide any analysis of time-varying data or of changes to URI references. ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-mt/ or in an earlier draft [[ Similarly, the model theory given here has no special provision for tracking temporal changes; it assumes, implicitly, that URIs have the same meaning whenever they occur. (If one wishes to apply RDF in a context where the referents of URIs (or names more generally) may change with time, then the current theory could be regarded as defining a 'snapshot' of the meaning of a changing representation.) ]] -- http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/WD-rdf-mt-20010925/ I believe that the 'snapshot' idea can be engineered (put into engines :-)) -- Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Monday, 22 December 2003 18:52:40 UTC