- From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 00:20:05 -0400
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Thu, Aug 28, 2003 at 04:27:34PM -0400, Ryan Lee wrote: > The spec has changed > to now claim that serialized RDF/XML "must be contained inside an rdf:RDF > XML element." [2] Eek! I can't believe I didn't notice this. Aesthetically, I think this is an awful idea. I had been using the fact that some "vanilla XML" was already RDF, as a selling point for RDF in my latest project - and it helped. It also allowed me to talk talk about the difference between the same bytes interpreted as XML, versus as RDF, for a real apples-to-apples to comparison; and that was a *huge* help, really. Is there an upside to requiring it? Thanks. Mark. -- Mark Baker. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. http://www.markbaker.ca
Received on Friday, 29 August 2003 00:47:02 UTC