- From: Frank Manola <fmanola@mitre.org>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 13:35:22 -0400
- To: Bob MacGregor <macgregor@isi.edu>
- CC: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Bob MacGregor wrote: > snip > > There ought to be an official "memberOf" property with domain RDF:Resource > and range RDF:List that is true for each member of a list. Implementers of > RDF servers might wish to implement such a property on their own, in hopes > that the (future) RDF committee will see the light and formally bless > such a > property some time in the future. > What is it you want to do again? While there isn't a "memberOf" property with domain rdf:Resource [actually, rdfs:Resource] and range rdf:List, there *is* an official rdf:first property with domain rdf:List and range rdfs:Resource (and the range resource is the actual "member"). Admittedly this is the other way around, but for query purposes (on well-formed RDF collections) it's not clear why the "change in direction" matters. --Frank > -- Frank Manola The MITRE Corporation 202 Burlington Road, MS A345 Bedford, MA 01730-1420 mailto:fmanola@mitre.org voice: 781-271-8147 FAX: 781-271-875
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 13:10:49 UTC