- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2003 09:32:27 +0100
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 05:09:12 -0700, Garret Wilson wrote: > The design of rdf:List looks good in theory, but there are a few details > that make it a pain to implement---particularly, the way rdf#nil is used: Its also quite awkward to query for, eg. in RDQL. I guess we need some kind of idiom that means is a memeber of this list. Theres nothing that logically comes from the structure though, unlike with collections. - Steve
Received on Thursday, 14 August 2003 04:32:29 UTC