- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 09:12:17 -0700
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>, "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org>
I just skimmed through the Adenine paper. It certainly is easier to read than XML, but it's a far cry from MKR. MKR was specifically designed to be English-like for easy readability. MKR is also UNIX-shell-like which makes for easy integration with Linux & Windows commands. Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ashley Yakeley" <ashley@semantic.org> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2003 3:06 AM Subject: Re: Alternatives to XML for RDF? > > In article <001501c36072$7a0a9d00$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200>, > "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net> wrote: > > > Since nobody else has mentioned MKR, I will say that > > it is also much nicer than XML. > > > > http://rhm.cdepot.net/ > > > > MKR is also a more powerful language -- it includes > > context, questions and commands. > > I found another one called Adenine, part of the Haystack project, that > seems to be similar. > <http://haystack.lcs.mit.edu/documentation/adenine.pdf> [PDF] > > -- > Ashley Yakeley, Seattle WA > >
Received on Tuesday, 12 August 2003 12:13:07 UTC