- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:12:08 -0700
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Nice paper, but I disagree with your premise. I think people should try to use the same physical expression. I do agree that it is desirable to be able to use the Ontology to reconcile different physical expressions. ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 8:39 AM Subject: ANN: White Paper - "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis" > Hi Folks, > > I have written a white paper[1] titled: > > "Using OWL to Avoid Syntactic Rigor Mortis" > > This paper summarizes the discussion on using a logical model (i.e., an > OWL Ontology) to enable many different physical expressions (i.e., many > different forms of instance documents). > > Comments welcome. /Roger > > [1] http://www.xfront.com/avoiding-syntactic-rigor-mortis.html
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 12:12:48 UTC