- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 05:26:59 -0700
- To: "Rinke Hoekstra" <rinke@lri.jur.uva.nl>
- Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Correction: I should have declared Part to be a Class, not a Property.
<Class Part> <subClassOf ObjectProperty> </Class>
============
Dick McCullough
knowledge := man do identify od existent done;
knowledge haspart proposition list;
----- Original Message -----
From: "Richard H. McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>
To: "Rinke Hoekstra" <rinke@lri.jur.uva.nl>
Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>; <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: (Updated) Camera Ontology
> Rinke
> Nothing wrong with Roger's model.
> I think you're just distracted by Roger's choice of names, especially
> "optics".
>
> Perhaps this formulation will be clearer (omitting xmlns qualifiers)
> <Class Camera />
> <Property Part> <subClassOf ObjectProperty> </Property>
> <Part body />
> <Part lens />
>
> <Camera aaa>
> <body bbb>
> <lens ccc>
> </Camera>
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 08:27:04 UTC