- From: Rinke Hoekstra <rinke@lri.jur.uva.nl>
- Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:05:46 +0200
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
- Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org>
Roger,
> I thing that this is a really cool idea! It nicely shows that "optics
> is a camera part".
No, what it says is that optics is a part relation between a camera and its
lens. Abstracting from this, it simply states that a lens is a part of a
camera.
However, even if it did say that, the statement that "optics is a camera
part" is false in my world. Whereas camera is a physical entity (an object,
or artifact), "optics" definately is not. What kind of part relation are we
talking about here?
Regards,
Rinke Hoekstra
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.471 / Virus Database: 269 - Release Date: 10-4-2003
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 04:05:55 UTC