- From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net>
- Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2003 22:31:15 -0700
- To: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Roger 1. Your description of "Part" is good. 2. "Part" is not a SymmetricProperty, and it is not a FunctionalProperty. Those are "facts", not "disadvantages". ============ Dick McCullough knowledge := man do identify od existent done; knowledge haspart proposition list; ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger L. Costello" <costello@mitre.org> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Cc: "Costello,Roger L." <costello@mitre.org> Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 8:53 AM Subject: (Updated) Camera Ontology snip > It had never occurred to me to subclass owl:ObjectProperty like this. > What do you think of this idea? What disadvantages are there to > subclassing ObjectProperty like this? I believe that a disadvantage is > that SymmetricProperty and FunctionalProperty would not be useable with > this subclass, correct? > > [Richard, I hope that I have accurately portrayed your idea.] > > /Roger
Received on Thursday, 17 April 2003 01:31:32 UTC