- From: Eli Israel <Eli@SemanticWorld.Org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:50:07 +0300
- To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Ok, I think I am ready to summarize this thread. It is a given that the URIs in an RDF/OWL document serve only as unique identifiers. One can not infer meaning from the content or stucture of the URIs. Similarly, the URI need not be a valid web address, and if it is, it need not point to anything having to do with the ontology. Likewise, the web authority has no obligation to present, in any way, information about the URIs that refer to it. That being said, we agree that it would be a good idea for the web authority refered to in the URI of a resource to provide information about that resource, either at the address pointed to by the URI, or through another mechanism. However, even if an authority provides information about a resource, it can not be seen as either authoritative or complete. Information about the resource garnered from other sources should be given equal weight. The provision of information by the web authority is, then, a technical convenience, and nothing more. Please correct me if I'm wrong. Eli Israel www.SemanticWorld.Org
Received on Thursday, 10 April 2003 07:50:10 UTC