W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > September 2002

Re: parsers that don't need rdf:RDF?

From: Jim Ley <jim@jibbering.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 14:12:47 -0000
Message-ID: <01b801c2662f$f54c2760$ca969dc3@emedia.co.uk>
To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>

"Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org>
> > I think an RDF implementation that worked with a SAX parser or a DOM
> > allowed the user to choose which bit of the doc was RDF would be
> > but no-ones asked me for that.
> This would probably be useful for things like SVG, which have blobs of
> down inside a <metadata> tag, potentially several per document.

my javascript rdf parser ( http://jibbering.com/rdf-parser/ ) can be made
to start parsing on a node in XML document, but it's not exactly a
general purpose (or all that good) rdf parser.

Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 10:15:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:38 UTC