- From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2002 10:00:01 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hpl.hp.com>
- cc: Bob DuCharme <bobdc@snee.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
On Fri, 27 Sep 2002, Jeremy Carroll wrote: > > > > > > I know that the W3C's "RDF Validation Service" at > > http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ and the downloadable ARP RDF > > processor underneath it don't require RDF statements to be > > enclosed inside of an rdf:RDF element. Are there any others that > > anyone can suggest? > > > > Something I've not done, which I think would be legal according to the spec > is allow you to switch ARP in at an arbitrary point in your XML doc ... > > > <blah> > <blah> > <blah> > <!-- this is RDF content because I just know --> > > > <!-- end RDF content --> > </blah> > </blah> > </blah> > > I think an RDF implementation that worked with a SAX parser or a DOM and > allowed the user to choose which bit of the doc was RDF would be compliant; > but no-ones asked me for that. This would probably be useful for things like SVG, which have blobs of RDF down inside a <metadata> tag, potentially several per document. Dan
Received on Friday, 27 September 2002 10:00:03 UTC