- From: Thomas B. Passin <tpassin@comcast.net>
- Date: Thu, 23 May 2002 20:41:04 -0400
- To: RDF Interest <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
[Patrick Stickler] > On 2002-05-23 9:03, "ext Thomas B. Passin" <tpassin@comcast.net> wrote: > > > > I think of stereotyped structures of statements like these as idioms. There > > will be a great many idioms, and applications may well be specialized for > > specific ones. A reified statement could be considered a kind of simple > > idiom. > > > > A query language will be needed that can effectively work with idioms. > > Simple idioms, with little depth, can be handled already by some query > > langaguages (I think, but haven't tried any of them), but I think more > > support for stereotyped structures will be necessary. > > > Such a QL could support idioms of arbitrary depth, where > the query is simply a template to match against the RDF graph. > You see it too - matching against templates of varying degrees of flexibility (graph regular expressions?). In fact, you could look at Topic Maps (translated into RDF) as just such an idiom. > And folks who already know RDF can easily learn and use the > ontology to express such queries without having to learn > yet-another-language -- not to mention the benefits of being > able to use RDF and XML tools to express/view their queries. > Cheers, Tom P
Received on Thursday, 23 May 2002 20:40:37 UTC