- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Sat, 4 May 2002 01:45:00 +0200
- To: "Lars Marius Garshol" <larsga@garshol.priv.no>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
I'm rather intrigued by the genealogy - TM mapping, if you can pass on any of your experiences I for one would be most grateful. >So my current approach is GEDCOM -> RDF, chew and mine RDF, RDF -> TM. >This works pretty well. Not entirely relevant, but what do you use for chewing & mining? >Unfortunately, I'm not sure I can release this, as it's done as part >of closed-source product development. The RDF schema is pretty >straightforward, though. The things that go on behind closed doors ;-) >Just look at the GEDCOM format documentation >and you can more or less recreate it directly. The latest stuff is if anything a bit more lumpy thanks to the CLS putting thechurch-related stuff in, but for a straight genealogical schema, I concur, GEDCOM more or less says it all. >I also looked around before starting on my own RDF schema to see if >anyone else had done RDF schemas for genealogical information, but >couldn't find any. Nope, me neither.
Received on Friday, 3 May 2002 19:50:42 UTC