Re: parseType"2literal"

  It would be nice that this q: meant the namespace but they don't do it
since the beginning so, I wouldn't expect so much.

  Good luck,
            Marc

Danny Ayers writes:

> The rest of the material posted makes sense to me, but I have trouble with
> the example below - by any (current) reckoning, surely "q:name" is just a
> literal string itself here (nothing can cross the quote threshold), and has
> no connection whatsoever to the earlier xmlns:q=... (without making a
> significant revision of the XML spec)??
> 
> 
> 3: Difficulties with QNames as Attribute Values
> ===============================================
> 
> Moving on to example 7 a_7.xml:
> [[[
> <rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
>    xmlns:eg="http://example.org/"
>    xmlns:q="http://example.org/q"  >
>    <rdf:Description>
>      <eg:a rdf:parseType="Literal">
>          <foo bar="q:name"/>
>      </eg:a>
>    </rdf:Description>
> </rdf:RDF>
> ]]]
> 
> ---
> 
> Danny Ayers
> <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff>
> 
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org
> >[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Jeremy Carroll
> >Sent: 11 March 2002 15:10
> >To: Jeremy Carroll; tarod@softhome.net
> >Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> >Subject: RE: parseType="literal"
> >
> >
> >Jeremy:
> >[[[
> >I went down this path over the weekend, the results of my musings
> >are on the
> >core list (not yet publicly visible - seems to be a W3C server problem).
> >]]]
> >
> >Here it is:
> >
> >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Mar/0100.html
> >
> >
> >Jeremy
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

Received on Tuesday, 12 March 2002 04:40:03 UTC