- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:20:43 +0200
- To: "Frangois Leygues" <francoisleygues@yahoo.com>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
>1) This is still an RDF issue: > >http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfs-constraining-containers Well, in general ok, but the question was specifically about constraining the members to be literals which (because of rdfs:Literal) isn't necessarily the same as constraining their class to any arbitrary type. >2) However, DAML solve that in some way. The problem > is that RDF containers seems deprecated now. I wasn't aware of this deprecation - do you have a ref? >3) It is also possible to subclass Containers and to >define some non standard convention... Is there clarification anywhere of the current meaning of range when applied to a container class? >4) It would be nice if a global status about this >question was presented here... Yes. (please!) Cheers, Danny.
Received on Wednesday, 31 July 2002 09:29:05 UTC