At 06:55 13/07/2002 -0400, Peter F. Patel-Schneider wrote: [...] >Well if literals represent `strings', then the simple idiom is likely to be >almost completely useless in OWL. Other than that I haven't thought >through the tidy solution, as it is quite different from what I am used to. >For example, it allows blank nodes to denote datatype values, leading to a >partial conflation of the object domain and the datatype domain, potentially >increasing the difficulty of reasoning. That sounds important. Can you say more? BrianReceived on Monday, 15 July 2002 14:42:15 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:37 UTC