W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-rdf-interest@w3.org > January 2002

RE: rdf-ns-prefix-confusion

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 16:27:02 -0000
To: "Uche Ogbuji" <uche.ogbuji@fourthought.com>
Cc: "www-rdf-interest" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDCEMFCCAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>

> > C: the reserved attribute names in an RDF/XML document always have their
> > special meaning, whatever the namespace of the element.
[ ... ]
> > C conversely would suggest that RDF/XML can define the
> > semantics of an attribute which modifies something not in its namespace.

> I'm not sure how C could ever come into sane contemplation.  ;-)

I am afraid that's how ARP treats unqualified attrs (I am the author of
ARP); but it does give a warning. The RDF Schema doc has one case where
there is an unqualified "resource" attr on an rdfs element.

Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 11:27:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:44:34 UTC