- From: Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:51:24 +0000
- To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Hi On Wed 09-Jan-2002 at 03:24:30PM -0500, Dan Brickley wrote: > > The smart thing is to *not* use well-known locations, but to follow an > age old tradition: if you want to know about a web site, *read its > homepage*. > > Being able to find a manifest or overview page for a site, w/ pointers > to associated web services, rss feeds, data dumps, site map file(s), > privacy statements etc etc is a worthy goal. But I'm having trouble > understanding the value of inventing WKRs beyond the published home > page URIs for these sites. Metadata could be embedded in the XHTML, > available by content negotiation, or linked to from home page. Or all > three... In terms of linking to sitemaps and metadata from XHTML would some additions to the link types in HTML 4 [1] be a good idea? I think rel="sitemap" and rel="meta" would make sense. Chris [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/types.html#type-links -- Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk> web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ web content management http://mkdoc.com/ everything else http://chris.croome.net/
Received on Wednesday, 9 January 2002 16:50:59 UTC