- From: Andrei S. Lopatenko <andrei@derpi.tuwien.ac.at>
- Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:33:36 +0100
- To: "David Greiff" <david.greiff@imk.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Hello David there is a lot discussions if it makes sense .. but see simultaneous use of xml schema and rdf in "application profiles" to specify semantic and syntaxis properties J. Hunter, C. Lagoze, "Combining RDF and XML Schemas to Enhance Interoperability Between Metadata Application Profiles" , WWW10, Hong Kong, May 2001 http://archive.dstc.edu.au/RDU/staff/jane-hunter/www10/paper.html some comparisons which might be useful to choose which languege to use for what http://trellis.semanticweb.org/expect/web/semanticweb/comparison.html http://citeseer.nj.nec.com/klein00relation.html http://www.daml.org/language/features.html best regards Andrei Lopatenko ----- Original Message ----- From: "David Greiff" <david.greiff@imk.fraunhofer.de> To: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2002 2:33 PM Subject: rdf with xml schema hello rdf-world, i'm searching for any articles or notes about the additional use of xml schema while using rdf with xml basis in order to obtain more syntactical constraints for the rdf-documents. (does this make sense? from my point of view it might bring some advantages for some less complex scenarios. but the document structure enforced by xmls would also put constraints on the order the statements have to appear etc. i think, that it will also be rather fiddly and elaborate to construct a suitable xml schema in addition to (respectively together with) an rdf schema.) thanks for your comments! regards, david greiff -- David Greiff, IMK.NetMedia Fraunhofer Institut für Medienkommunikation Schloß Birlinghoven B3-236 Tel.: +49/2241/14-1971
Received on Wednesday, 13 February 2002 09:34:03 UTC