- From: Graham Klyne <GK@NineByNine.org>
- Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2002 12:21:35 +0000
- To: Charles McCathieNevile <charles@w3.org>
- Cc: "'www-rdf-interest@w3.org'" <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
At 02:48 AM 12/1/02 -0500, Charles McCathieNevile wrote:
>As an inermediate layer, then, we still have two different approaches,
>meaning that authors of interfaces for people have to work out two ways of
>matching them to query engines.
>
>Is this diversity a good thing because it enables different kinnds of users,
>or just ebcause it enables different programmers to develop systems easier,
>or is it a problem?
FWIW, I think it's too soon to be trying to eliminate diversity in
("standardize") RDF queries. In practice, I think the various query
approaches can be mapped reasonably easily, so I don't think different
queries create unbridgeable islands. My own query mechanism ends up
reducing to an SQL-ish kind of approach.
#g
-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Monday, 2 December 2002 11:21:18 UTC