- From: Peter F. Patel-Schneider <pfps@research.bell-labs.com>
- Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 10:22:50 -0400
- To: sean@mysterylights.com
- Cc: www-rdf-interest@w3.org
Comments on http://infomesh.net/2002/notation3/ I have a serious problem with a document on N3 that starts out saying that N3 is a ``shorthand non-XML serialization of RDF''. I view this statement as wrong and, worse, completely misleading. Most uses of N3 that I have seen are not RDF. Indeed, the second paragraph in http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3 makes it quite clear that N3 is supposed to be much more than yet another serialization of RDF. The document itself alludes to the non-correspondence of N3 and RDF when it says there is ``a notable lack of analogies for various features of N3 in XML RDF''. The document goes on to state that N3 ``forms a good introduction into [sic] many key principles of the Semantic Web''. Well if you count among the key principles of the Semantic Web a lack of both syntax and semantics, then I'll go along with this statement, but I would hope that the Semantic Web would not continue to espouse these principles. Peter F. Patel-Schneider Bell Labs Research
Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 10:23:02 UTC