- From: Danny Ayers <danny666@virgilio.it>
- Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2002 11:22:37 +0200
- To: "Chris Croome" <chris@webarchitects.co.uk>, <andreas.eberhart@i-u.de>
- Cc: <www-rdf-interest@w3.org>
Just mulling over document metrics that might be nice for future surveys. Initial thoughts : * total refs - incoming, outgoing * ratio of in/out (authority/hub) * locatability of refs - what proportion of URIs are URLs * terminality - things that point to non-RDF data (like RSS) * terminologicality (ugh - better word?) - how much content is assertions, how much schema (TBox/ABox ratio?) I'm sure most of this kind of stuff is well documented pre-RDF, but if the results were themselves expressed in RDF then they could be very useful in relevance heuristics. Done in SVG it might make pretty patterns, too... Cheers, Danny. --- Danny Ayers <stuff> http://www.isacat.net </stuff> Idea maps for the Semantic Web http://ideagraph.net >-----Original Message----- >From: www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org >[mailto:www-rdf-interest-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Croome >Sent: 19 August 2002 16:54 >To: www-rdf-interest@w3.org >Subject: Re: Survey of RDF data on the Web > > > >Hi > >On Mon 19-Aug-2002 at 09:23:02 -0400, Dan Brickley wrote: >> >> Hunting for RDF in the general Web is like looking for the proverbial >> 'needle in a haystack'. > >I'm not sure if the interface at http://www.syndic8.com/ allows you to >get a list of RSS 1.0 feeds but if it does that might be a good source >since a valid RSS 1.0 feed should be valid RDF, however I suspect that >these feeds will only reference XHTML rather than other RDF resources. > >Chris > >-- >Chris Croome <chris@webarchitects.co.uk> >web design http://www.webarchitects.co.uk/ >web content management http://mkdoc.com/ >everything else http://chris.croome.net/ >
Received on Wednesday, 21 August 2002 05:32:30 UTC