- From: Paul Prescod <paul@prescod.net>
- Date: Tue, 20 Aug 2002 10:12:33 -0700
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
"Sean B. Palmer" wrote: > >... > > It's of great value when you have the rule to cope with it. There are > hundreds of rules like this for the properties and classes in RDF, RDFS, > and DAML. Check out:- > > http://infomesh.net/2001/05/rdflint/rules.n3 I notice daml:equivalentTo's definition is not in there. > ... > However, normally it's just annoying. You shouldn't use more triples than > you can get away with, because it's a waste of data, and makes things > difficult to read. Sounds like a job for filtering to me. Should there at least be a simple syntax for me to "turn on" the definition for these pre-defined things instead of duplicating definitions all over the place? Some kind of include? Or maybe a --think-really-hard? -- "When I walk on the floor for the final execution, I'll wear a denim suit. I'll walk in there like Willie Nelson, John Wayne, Will Smith -- Men in Black -- James Brown. Maybe do a Michael Jackson moonwalk." Congressman James Traficant.
Received on Tuesday, 20 August 2002 13:15:21 UTC