RE: CYCLES IN CLASS/PROPERTY HIERARCHIES

Yes, that was my point :-) 
Since you wish to disjoint the two classes, using a higher level class
for common properties (at least in this case) would make sense, it's the
natural way one can model these.

With every respect to you and the rest of the people posting on this
thread, I believe the whole discussion on the cycle subject is slightly
missplaced. It would be far more interesting or even pragmatic to
explore how cycles can serve us as a construct and document them for
further development (meaning simply the semantics of the language),
instead of thinking ways they can be harmfull when IMHO nobody is going
to use them likewise.

Kindest regards,

Manos Batsis

-----Αρχικό μήνυμα----- 
Από: Vassilis Christophides 
Αποστολή: Παρ 26/10/2001 5:57 μμ 
Προς: Manos Batsis 
Κοιν.: peter.crowther@networkinference.com;
tolle@dbis.informatik.uni-frankfurt.de; www-rdf-interest@w3.org 
Θέμα: Re: CYCLES IN CLASS/PROPERTY HIERARCHIES



 Hi Manos
 
 Their is no class named Human. I just have as classes Male and
Female
 and I still wont to define a name property.
 
 Kindest regards,
 
 Vassilis

Received on Saturday, 27 October 2001 17:00:11 UTC