- From: <Patrick.Stickler@nokia.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 15:35:33 +0300
- To: danbri@w3.org
- Cc: pfps@research.bell-labs.com, devon@taller.pscl.cwru.edu, www-rdf-interest@w3.org
> > <rdf:type rdf:resource="xyz:string"/> > > We're simply not in a position to change the spec to allow namespace > qualified names in attribute values. That would fit better in a WG > chartered to improve the RDF syntax, rather than bugfix it. So if > 'xyz:string' is supposed to be using XML namespaces, no can do. > > But don't let this put you off! Proposals for new, better, > faster sleeker > RDF XML syntaxes are always welcome. Ummmm..... sorry, but that's a URI, not a qname. I know it looks like a qname, but it's not ;-) Its a URV scheme ;-) No need to change the spec... Cheers, Patrick -- Patrick Stickler Phone: +358 3 356 0209 Senior Research Scientist Mobile: +358 50 483 9453 Nokia Research Center Fax: +358 7180 35409 Visiokatu 1, 33720 Tampere, Finland Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 08:35:47 UTC